Ponnudurai Vs The Inspector of Police

suspend the sentence in S.C.NO.483 of 2016, dated 25.8.2023, passed by the learned District and Sessions Judg(FTC), Tenkasi and to enlarge the Petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal.

¶23

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶24

3.The Petitioner is a life convict, who is sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 of IPC. The Petitioner is in prison since 25.08.2023.The appeal against conviction is pending and not likely to be taken up immediately.

¶25

4.The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that there are several lacunae in the prosecution case. Primarily, the deceased is the wife of the Petitioner died of self immolation. However, the Police has falsely registered a case under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court had failed to take note of Ex.P11-Accident Register which is the earliest document on the side of the prosecution which clearly show that the deceased

¶26

was taken to the hospital by the Petitioner and the Doctor, who registered the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/5

¶28

CRL MP(MD) NO. 11306 of 2024

¶29

accident Register, recorded it as a case of self immolation. The learned counsel would also submit that in the dying declaration alleged to have been recorded by the Doctor though it is stated that it was recorded on 6.7.2014 at 12.25 p.m., it had reached the Court only after a delay of ten days and no satisfactory explanation was given by the prosecution for the said delay.

¶30

5.Considering the fact that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence and based on the circumstance, the Petitioner was found guilt and convicted, this Court is of the view that pending disposal of the appeal, the Petitioner be released on bail. Accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner alone is suspended, subject to the following conditions:

¶31

i. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on

¶32

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

¶33

thousand only) with two sureties, of whom, one should be

¶34

a blood-related surety, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge

¶35

(FTC), Tenkasi.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis