Allowed

Kanagaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC21 Aug 2025CRL MP(MD)/11009/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 528 BNSS to relax a bail-related condition imposed in an earlier order. The petitioner had been complying with the conditions regularly, as conceded by the State. The court relaxed the condition, directing the petitioner to report to police only when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed on 09.07.2025 relaxed; petitioner to report before respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Kanagaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.11009 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/08/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI

¶3

CRL MP(MD). No.11009 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.11435 of 2025

¶4

Kanagaraj

¶5

... Petitioner/ Petitioner

¶6

¶7

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.158 of 2025). ... Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner : M/s.N.Balasubramanian Advocate.

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash

¶10

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS.

¶12

PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court in its order, dated 09.07.2025, passed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11435 of 2025.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in

¶15

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11435 of 2025 dated 09.07.2025.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

CRL MP(MD). No.11009 of 2025

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner has

¶20

been complying with the conditions imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶21

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner has complied with the condition regularly.

¶22

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed by this Court, Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11435 of 2025 dated 09.07.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

sd/-

21/08/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

pnn

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/3

¶30

CRL MP(MD). No.11009 of 2025

¶31

¶32

1 The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur District.

¶33

2 The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District.

¶34

3 The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.11009 of 2025 IN

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.11435 of 2025 Date :21/08/2025

¶37

AS/16.09.2025/3P/4C

¶38

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/3

Kanagaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanagaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palanichamy Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Asaraf Ali @ Asaraf Vs The Inspector of Police

T.Mukesh Babu Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Kanimozhi Vs The Inspector of Police

Sheik Dawoodu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

A. Singaraja Yadav Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by