Allowed

Valarmathi v. the Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC7 Jan 2025CRL MP/18381/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner detained by Executive Magistrate for violating a bail bond sought suspension of the detention order pending a criminal revision. Court, weighing her incarceration since 31.10.2024, suspended the detention order and released her on bail pending disposal of the revision.

What did the court decide?

Impugned detention order suspended; petitioner released on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties pending criminal revision.

Valarmathi Vs the Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional… — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.01.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶7

Valarmathi ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur.

¶10

2.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, PEW, Periyapalaiyam Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.309 of 2024). ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 438 r/w 442 BNSS, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in order, dated 13.11.2024 made in M.P.No.110/2024 on the file of the Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur and release the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Revision.

¶12

Page No.1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Criminal Revision Case challenges the impugned order, dated

¶18

26.11.2024 in M.P.No.110 of 2024 passed by the 1 st respondent under Section 122(i)(a) of Cr.P.C., directing the petitioner to be detained for 113 days for violation of the bail bond executed by the petitioner on 20.02.2024.

¶19

2.In violation of the bail bond executed by the petitioner, the petitioner had committed the offence under Section 4(1)(A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and she was arrested in Crime No.309 of 2024. It is reported that this Court had granted bail to the petitioner in the said case.

¶20

3.The petitioner is in custody from 31.10.2024. Considering the period of incarceration and since the grounds raised in the revision has to be considered, this Court is inclined to suspend the impugned order and release the petitioner. Accordingly, the impugned order, dated 26.11.2024 in

¶21

Page No.2 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶24

M.P.No.110 of 2024 passed by the 1 st respondent is suspended and the

¶25

petitioner is released on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties

¶26

each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the 1^st respondent.

¶27

4.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

07.01.2025

(2/2)

vv2

Note: Issue Order Copy on 07.01.2025.

¶32

¶33

1.The Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur.

¶34

2.The Inspector of Police,

¶35

PEW, Periyapalaiyam Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

¶36

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

¶37

Page No.3 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶40

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

¶41

vv2

¶42

Crl.M.P.No.18381 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.2383 of 2024

¶43

07.01.2025 (2/2)

¶44

Page No.4 of 4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Valarmathi v. the Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Valarmathi v. the Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Saravanan Vs S.Tamilselvi

Mukesh Kumar Purohith Vs the State, Rep by Inspector of Police

Elangovan Vs State Rep by

K.Ponnusamy Vs Giriraj

S.Manivannan Vs the State Rep.by

G.Venkataraj Vs State by , the Inspector of Police