Dismissed¶23

G.Selvanayagi v. Mukundan

Madras HC5 Aug 2025CRL MP/14678/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 05.08.2025 by Justice M. Nirmal Kumar dismissing Crl.M.P. No.14678 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9456 of 2025, filed by G.Selvanayagi through S.Selva Thirumurugan, seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted on 01.04.2025 to A1 to A4 (Mukundan, Dhandapani Arumugam, Kalaivani, Tamileelam) on the ground that A2 to A4 failed to comply with bond/reporting conditions; dismissed in view of prior order in Crl.M.P.No.14673 of 2025; no statute or precedent cited; police station concerned: AWPS Thiruvanmiyur, Neelanakarai, Chennai (Govt. Advocate C. Baskaran for R5).

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail is dismissed in view of the order already passed in Crl.M.P.No.14673 of 2025. ¶23

G.Selvanayagi Vs Mukundan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.M.P. No.14678 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9456 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

Crl.M.P. No.14678 of 2025 in Crl.O.P. No.9456 of 2025

¶7

G.Selvanayagi ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Mukundan

¶10

2.Dhandapani Arumugam

¶11

3.Kalaivani

¶12

4.Tamileelam

¶13

The State rep by its The Inspector of Police, AWPS Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Neelanakarai, Chennai.

¶14

... Respondent

¶15

For Petitioners : M/s.S.Selva Thirumurugan

¶16

For R5 : Mr. C. Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondent 1 to A4 in Crl.O.P.No.9456 of 2025 dated 01.04.2025.

¶19

1/3

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.M.P. No.14678 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9456 of 2025

¶22

2 . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court by an order dated 01.04.2025 had granted anticipatory bail to respondent 1 to 4(A1 to A4) with a condition that the respondent 1 to 4 shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties and further conditions that the said Mukundan/A1 shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders and the other petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The said Mukundan had executed the sureties and also complied with the conditions and his relaxation petition was also modified thereafter, however, respondent 2 to 4 had not complied with the conditions and hence, seeks for cancellation of anticipatory bail to A2 to A4.

¶23