Keerthi Raj v. Anandhakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal original petition; the court dismissed it as withdrawn based on counsel's submission and endorsement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.14580 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
Crl.M.P.No.14580 of 2025 in
Crl.O.P.No.5461 of 2025
Keerthi Raj ... Petitioner
Vs.
For Petitioner : M/s.R.Rajkumar For R2 : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for
the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
1/3
Crl.M.P.No.14580 of 2025
counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
25.11.2025
sma
To
2/3
Crl.M.P.No.14580 of 2025
K.RAJASEKAR, J.
sma
Crl.M.P.No.14580 of 2025
25.11.2025
3/3
Keerthi Raj
Anandhakrishnan
The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, T-6, Avadi Police Station
K.Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court