Allowed¶27

Gokulakrishnan v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Nov 2025CRL MP/11956/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; K. Rajasekar J.; order dated 06-11-2025; Crl.M.P.No.11956 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025; Section 528 BNSS; cancellation of bail; breach of bail condition; non-compliance with deposit of Rs.3,00,000/-; Crime No.58 of 2025; G-5 Secretariat Colony Police Station, Chennai; defacto complainant Gokulakrishnan; accused Murali; bail cancelled; petition allowed; second respondent absent despite notice.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation of the bail granted to the second respondent/accused (Murali) in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025 dated 02.04.2025. ¶27

Gokulakrishnan Vs The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.11956 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06-11-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

CRL MP NO.11956 of 2025 in CRL OP NO. 9633 of 2025

¶7

Gokulakrishnan ... Petitioner/ defacto complainant

¶8

¶9

The Inspector of Police, G-5, Secretariat Colony Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.58 of 2025) ... 1^st Respondent/ Complainant 2. Murali ... 2^nd Respondent/ Accused

¶10

PRAYER: This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent herein by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025 dated 02.04.2025.

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.T. Narendiran For R1 : Mr. S. Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : No Appearance

¶12

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.M.P.No.11956 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the defacto complainant/ petitioner, to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent herein by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025 dated 02.04.2025.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ defacto complainant submitted that the accused/ 2^nd respondent herein was granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 02.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025 with one of the conditions that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.58 of 2025 before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on such deposit, the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the same; that however, the accused had not complied with the said condition, hence prays to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent/ accused.

¶19

Though notice was served on the second respondent, there is no representation on his behalf and he also not appeared before this Court.

¶20

Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.M.P.No.11956 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025

¶24

the first respondent.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, since the

¶26

accused/ second respondent had not complied with the condition of deposit of Rs.3,00,000/- as imposed on him by this Court, vide order dated 02.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.9633 of 2025, I am of the view that the bail granted to the accused/ second respondent herein is hereby cancelled.

¶27