Dismissed¶24

T.K.S. Bharathi, 38 Yrs, v. Asst. Commissioner of Police

Madras HC13 Nov 2025CRL A/538/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Victim's appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. against acquittal (S.C.No.449 of 2011, Sessions Judge Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai, 16.06.2016) for offences under Sections 306, 498A and 506(ii) IPC; appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's counsel's submission and endorsement; no merits discussed; no precedent applied; Madras High Court, single judge, dated 13.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, in view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal. ¶24

T.K.S. Bharathi, 38 Yrs, Vs Asst. Commissioner of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.A.No.538 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

Crl.A.No.538 of 2017

T.K.S.Bharathi

... Appellant/Victim

Versus

1.The State Rep by Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thyagaraya Nagar Range, Chennai – 17.

¶11

2.Nagaraj 3.C.H.Yuvakrishnan 4.Preethika Nagaraj 5.Sivagamasundari

¶12

6.Grahalakshmi 7.Chithala Kusuma ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai in S.C.No.449 of 2011 dated 16.06.2016, acquitting the second respondent for the offence under Section 306 of I.P.C. and acquitting the respondents 3 and 4 for offence under Sections 498A, 506(ii) and 306 of I.P.C. and acquitting the respondents 5 to 7 for the offences under Sections 498A and 306 of I.P.C. and set aside the same.

¶14

For Appellant : Mr.S.V.Karthikeyan

¶15

Page No.1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.A.No.538 of 2017

¶18

For Respondent-1 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondents : Mr.S.Sai Shankar 2 to 4 & 7 For Respondent-5 : Mr.M.Mohammed Rafi

¶19

For Respondent-6 : Mr.C.T.Murugappan

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. He has also

¶22

made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.

¶23