Disposed¶24

S.Anandh v. L.Rejini

Madras HC8 Apr 2025CONT P(MD)/971/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11; wilful disobedience; non-implementation of writ direction; compliance by fresh orders dated 08.04.2025; contempt case closed; no further adjudication; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Chief Educational Officer, Tenkasi; Cont.P.(MD) No.971 of 2025; W.P.(MD) No.18059 of 2023.

What did the court decide?

No punishment or other relief; the contempt case was closed upon noting compliance with the writ order dated 12.04.2024. ¶24

Why is it important?

S.Anandh Vs L.Rejini — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD) No.971 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

Cont.P.(MD) No.971 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.18059 of 2023

¶7

S.Anandh .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

L.Rejini Chief Educational Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. .. Respondent

¶10

Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/3^rd respondent for her deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 12.04.2024 passed in W.P. (MD) No.18059 of 2023.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Vasik Ali for Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondent : Mr.T.Amjad Khan

¶12

_________Page 1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Cont.P.(MD) No.971 of 2025

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This contempt case has been filed complaining the wilful disobedience of the respondent in implementing the order dated 12.04.2024 in W.P.(MD) No.18059 of 2023.

¶17

2.While disposing of the said writ petition, this Court directed the third respondent therein to give fresh look into the matter in view of the pending proceedings and the recommendation of the fourth respondent and pass orders afresh, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

¶18

3.During the course of hearing today, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the order of the Court is complied with by passing orders afresh on 08.04.2025.

¶19

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.

¶20

_________Page 2 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Cont.P.(MD) No.971 of 2025

¶23

5.In view of the above factual position, in my considered view, no further adjudication is required in the present case.

¶24

6.Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.