This contempt petition seeking punishment for willful disobedience of a prior court order was closed. The respondent submitted that the underlying appeal was disposed of as directed by the Court, and no further order was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.08.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
P.Samraj
... Petitioner
Vs
T.N.Hariharan, The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent herein for the willful disobedience and direct him to comply with of order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.18624 of 2024 dated 05-08-2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh Manickam For Respondent : Mrs.S.Jeya Priya, Govt. Advocate
1/4
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
O R D E R
When the Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that pursuant to the direction issued in the main Writ Petition, the appeal preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the first respondent on 07.08.2025 in Se.Mu.Aa.No.K1/806495/2020. The copy of the order was also handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.
08.08.2025
vsm
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No
2/4
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
To
The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3/4
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsm
Cont.P(MD)No.667 of 2025
08.08.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Samraj
T.N.Hariharan
S. Sountnar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
