S.Devi v. v.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a Madras High Court writ order. Counsel reported that a writ appeal against the writ order had been allowed, setting it aside. The single judge accordingly dropped further proceedings and closed the contempt petition without costs.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD)No.522 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 13.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Cont.P.(MD)No.522 of 2025
S.Devi
... Petitioner
Vs
1.V.Saravanan,
The General Manager, Tamiladu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli region, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli District.
2.Vijela,
The Assistant Manager (Appointments), Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli region, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should contempt proceedings proceed for willful disobedience of the writ order, given the underlying writ petition order was set aside by an allowed writ appeal?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Devi
- respondent
V.Saravanan
- respondent
Vijela
- respondent
S.Rajasekar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court