C.Bharathidasan v. T.N.Venkatesh IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a direction to consider a representation within six weeks. Respondent admitted delay but tendered unconditional apology and undertook social work. Court closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed on compliance with undertaking
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.489 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reserved on : 21.04.2025
Pronounced on : 28.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Cont.P.(MD)No.489 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.9743 of 2024
C.Bharathidasan
...Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.T.N.Venkatesh.I.A.S., Commissioner,
O/o Directorate of Backward Classes & Minority Welfare 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam,
Chepakkam, Chennai – 600 005 ... Contemnor/Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the court order by failing to implement it within the stipulated time?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Bharathidasan
- respondent
Mr.T.N.Venkatesh.I.A.S., Commissioner, O/o Directorate of Backward Classes & Minority Welfare
Coram
Battu Devanand
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court