Disposed

M.F.Thangaraja v. K.Veera Raghava Rao

Madras HC27 Mar 2025CONT P(MD)/468/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging wilful non-compliance with a writ appellate court order. Government Advocate furnished departmental proceedings dated 06.11.2024 reporting compliance; petitioner's counsel confirmed the order was complied with. The contempt petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed after compliance with the writ order was reported and confirmed.

M.F.Thangaraja Vs K.Veera Raghava Rao — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.03.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN

¶7

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024 in

¶8

W.A(MD)No.788 of 2013

¶9

M.F.Thangaraj ... Petitioner/2^nd Respondent

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1.Mr.K.Veera Raghava Rao,

¶12

The Commissioner of Technical Education,

¶13

The Directorate of Technical Education,

¶14

Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶15

2.Mr.Muthuraja The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Thoothukudi District.

¶16

...Contemnors/Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors/respondents for their wilful of the order of this Court in W.A(MD)No.788 of 2013 dated 13.03.2023.

¶18

For Petitioner : M/s.K.Shwathini, for Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents :Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate

¶19

Page 1 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024

¶22

ORDER

¶23

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶24

AND

¶25

K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

¶26

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the contemnors furnished a copy of the proceedings that the Higher Education Department, dated 06.11.2024 reporting the compliance to show the order of this Court been duly complied.

¶27

2.The learned counsel appearing for the contempt petitioner states that

¶28

the order of this Court been complied with.

¶29

3.In the light of the above, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶30

[G.J., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.]

¶31

27.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

¶32

Page 2 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024

¶35

¶36

1.Mr.K.Veera Raghava Rao,

¶37

The Commissioner of Technical Education, The Directorate of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶38

2.Mr.Muthuraja The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Thoothukudi District.

¶39

Page 3 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024

¶42

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN,J. Ns

¶43

Cont.P(MD)No.468 of 2024 in W.A(MD)No.788 of 2013

¶44

27.03.2025

¶45

Page 4 of 4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.F.Thangaraja v. K.Veera Raghava Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.F.Thangaraja v. K.Veera Raghava Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary to Education Department Vs R.Muthian

Thirunavukarasu Vs The Block Development Officer

A.M.Thirumal Vs The District Collector

St.John Girls Higher Secondaty School Vs S.Kannappan

V.Sahaya Carmel Rajan Vs Gunasekaran

Arulraj Ps Vs The Secretary