Disposed

K.R.Hari Narayanan v. G.J.Radha Maheswari

Madras HC15 Dec 2025CONT P(MD)/2606/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Father filed a contempt petition alleging breach of a consent order on child custody/access. Finding the children unwilling to be with their father and enforcement impossible, the Division Bench recalled the consent order and directed that the appeal be listed afresh.

What did the court decide?

Consent order dated 21.11.2024 recalled; Registry directed to list C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019 afresh before the roster Division Bench.

K.R.Hari Narayanan Vs G.J.Radha Maheswari — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶6

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019

¶7

K.R.Hari Narayanan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

G.J.Radha Maheswari ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to call the contemnor/respondent for having willfully and wantonly disobeyed the order passed by this Honourable Court in CMA(MD) No.846/2019 dated 21.11.2024 and punish the contemnor in accordance with law.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Hari Narayanan, Party-in-person. For Respondent : Ms.G.J.Radha Maheswari, Party-in-person.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(Order of the court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)

¶17

Heard both sides.

¶18

2.The petitioner herein filed C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019

¶19

questioning the order passed by the Family Court, Trichy in G.W.O.P.No.20 of 2017 dated 24.06.2019. The civil miscellaneous

¶20

appeal was disposed of in terms of the consent memo dated 21.11.2024 filed by the parties.

¶21

3.The petitioner now complains that the respondent is not acting in terms of the consent memo. The respondent strongly states that she has no role in the matter and that children are not ready to be in the company of the petitioner herein (their father).

¶22

4.In these circumstances, it is not possible to enforce the consent order passed by this Court. We, therefore, recall the order dated 21.11.2024 made in C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025

¶26

5.The Registry is directed to list C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019

¶27

afresh before the Hon'ble Division Bench holding the roster.

¶28

(G.R.S. J.,) & (R.P. J.,) 15.12.2025

¶29

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶30

To:

¶31

G.J.Radha Maheswari, D/o.G.Jeya Raman, No.5, 2nd Street, Alpha Nagar, Karumandapuram, Trichy – 620 001.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025

¶35

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and R.POORNIMA, J.

¶36

ias

¶37

Cont.P.(MD)No.2606 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.846 of 2019

¶38

15.12.2025

¶39

4/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.R.Hari Narayanan v. G.J.Radha Maheswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.R.Hari Narayanan v. G.J.Radha Maheswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Victoriyan Anita Vs R.Sangeetha Chinnarani

Santhakumari Vs Dheeraj Kumar I.A.S.

Muthulakshmi Vs Dheeraj Kumar IAS

Banumathi Vs Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, IAS

T.Aruldoss Vs Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, IAS

Antony Sunil Babu Vs Saravanakumar The Inspector of Police