Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ order directing the District Collector to consider the petitioner's application for guardianship under the National Trust Act. The respondent produced proceedings showing the petitioner was appointed guardian on 13.11.2024; the court recorded compliance and closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 19.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.17143 of 2023
N.S.Krishnan ... Petitioner
versus
Dr.V.P.Jeyaseelan, I.A.S., The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent
Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the Contemnor/respondent for having committed grave and gross disobedience of the order dated 31.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.17143 of 2023.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this Contempt Petition complaining that
the order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.17143 of 2023 dated
1/5
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
31.07.2023 has not been complied with.
Mandamus, directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner as a Guardian/Curator of Ms.A.R.Chandra and to manage her properties by considering his application filed under Section 14(1) of the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999, r/w. Rule 16 of the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Rules 2000.
2/5
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
this contempt petition is listed today. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
19.09.2025
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes . No. Internet: Yes / No.
3/5
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
To
Dr.V.P.Jeyaseelan, I.A.S., The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar District.
4/5
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
Cont.P.(MD)No.2103 of 2024
19.09.2025
5/5
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
G.Babu vs. District Collector, Madurai and othersReferred¶3
G.Babu vs. District Collector, Madurai and others (W.P.(MD)No.18042 of 2022, dated 24.01.2023)
3 provisions across 2 enactments
N.S.Krishnan
Dr.V.P.Jeyaseelan, I.A.S., The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar District
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
