Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a writ order. Counsel jointly submitted the order under contempt had been complied with; the court recorded compliance and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.11058 of 2025
Purushothaman ...Petitioner/ Petitioner
Vs.
Rajendran The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. ... Contemnor/ 1st Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/first respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience in implementation of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.11058 of 2025 dated 21.04.2025.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Tamil Vanan
For Contemnor : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian Government Advocate
1/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025
ORDER
When the Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the contemnor would submit that the order under contempt has been complied with.
15.07.2025
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm
To
2/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025
3/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
csm
Order made in Cont.P.(MD)No.1825 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.11058 of 2025
Dated : 15.07.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Purushothaman
Rajendran The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar
S.SOUNTHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
