Disposed¶20

S.P.Senthil kumar v. T.R. Chezhian

Madras HC19 Jun 2025CONT P(MD)/1317/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cont.P.(MD) No.1317 of 2025 (Madurai Bench, Madras High Court, 19.06.2025, K.Murali Shankar J.) — contempt under Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, for alleged disobedience of order dated 12.08.2024 in W.P(MD)No.19233 of 2024 by T.R.Chezhian, Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy District — Court noted final report filed in Crime No.223 of 2024 under Sections 326(1) and 61(2) BNS against Perumal and Naveenkumar — petition closed on petitioner's counsel's request; no punishment; no costs discussed; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed (no punishment imposed), recording the filing of the final report and the petitioner's counsel's submission. ¶20

S.P.Senthil kumar Vs T.R. Chezhian — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD)No.1317 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.06.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

CONT.P(MD)No.1317 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.19233 of 2024

¶7

S.P.Senthil Kumar Petitioner

¶8

Vs T.R.Chezhian, Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police station, Trichy District. Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/respondent for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court passed in W.P(MD)No.19233 of 2024, dated 12.08.2024.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking orders to punish the

¶13

contemnor/respondent for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court passed in W.P(MD)No.19233 of 2024, dated 12.08.2024.

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Cont.P.(MD)No.1317 of 2025

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing today (i.e., 19.06.2025), the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that FIR came to be registered in Crime No.223 of 2024 against the some unknown persons and after investigation, Thuraiyur Police has laid the final report for the alleged offences under Sections 326(1) and 61(2) of BNS against the two persons named Perumal and Naveenkumar and also produced the copy of the final report.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording

¶19

the same, the contempt petition may be closed.

¶20

In view of the above, the Contempt Petition is closed.

¶21

19.06.2025

¶22

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das To

¶23

1.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police station, Trichy District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶24

2/3

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Cont.P.(MD)No.1317 of 2025

¶27

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

¶28

das

¶29

Order made in CONT.P(MD)No.1317 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.19233 of 2024