Disposed¶30

R. Sakthivel v. Malarvizhi and Another

Madras HC6 Jun 2025CONT P/642/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court contempt petition closed after compliance confirmed; Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act; wilful disobedience of order dated 10.10.2023 in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021 directing appointment order within four weeks; compliance via appointment order R.C.No. 073/2025/P4 dated 05.06.2025; petitioner joined service; Dharmapuri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.; Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies; District Recruitment Board Dharmapuri; Battu Devanand J.; decided 06.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed without punitive action, as the underlying writ order dated 10.10.2023 in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021 was found to have been complied with. ¶30

R. Sakthivel Vs Malarvizhi and Another — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025

R. Sakthivel

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Malarvizhi,

Dharmapuri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Spcial Officer/The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri.

¶12

2.Saravanan,

¶13

The Joint Registrar of Co-operatives/Chairman, District Recruitment Board, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 10.10.2023 in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Kamalanathan For Respondents : Mr. A. Praveen Kumar, for R1 Mr. R. Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General Asst. by Mrs. Geetha Thamaraiselvan for R2

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining wilful

¶21

disobedience of the respondents in complying the order dated 10.10.2023

¶22

in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021.

¶23

While allowing the said writ petition, this Court directed the respondent therein to issue appointment order to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of that order.

¶24

During the course of hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the order of the Court is complied with by issuing appointment order to the petitioner in R.C.No. 073/2025/P4 dated 05.06.2025 and she further submits that the petitioner joined in service also.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.

¶26

In view of the above factual position, as the order of the Court is complied with, in our considered view, no further adjudication is not required in the present contempt case.

¶27

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025

¶30