S.Anbuselvam, v. K.Nalina
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobeying a previous order regarding a charge memo. The Court held that the validity of the charge memo is a separate issue that cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CONT P No. 4278 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
CONT P No. 4278 of 2025 AND SUB APPL NO. 1384 OF 2025
S.Anbuselvam,
S/o. D.Sadhasivam, Mariyamman Koil Street, No.26, Sethur, Mayiladuthurai - 609 114.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
K.Nalina, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep. by its. Senior Regional Manager, Mayiladuthurai Region, Mayiladuthurai.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a charge memo can be challenged within the framework of a contempt petition?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Anbuselvam
- respondent
K.Nalina
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court