Ramco Institute of Technology v. Prof. Dr.v.Kumaresan
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025 and
Sub.A.No.1338 of 2025
Ramco Institute of Technology, represented by its Principal, North Vengallur, Krishnapuram Panchayat, Rajapalayam 626117, Virudhunagar District.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
Prof. Dr.V.Kumaresan, Registrar, Anna University, Chennai 600 025.
Contemnor(s)
PRAYER The contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for deliberately violating the order of this Honourable Court dated 09.10.2025 made in W.P.No. 38322 of 2025.
For Petitioner(s): M/s.Kandhan Duraisami For Contemnor(s): Mr.J.Ravindran Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.U.Baranidharan Standing Counsel
1 of 4
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025
ORDER
The contempt petition is filed to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying and having committed contempt of the order dated 09.10.2025 made in W.P.No. 38322 of 2025.
served on the learned counsel who is receiving across the Court.
that let the originals be served on the petitioner so that it would be clear as to on what date they received the order.
2 of 4
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025
stands closed.
08-12-2025
veda Neutral Citation:Yes/No
To The Registrar, Anna University, Chennai 600 025.
3 of 4
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. veda
CONT P No. 4133 of 2025 and Sub.A.No.1338 of 2025
08-12-2025
4 of 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramco Institute of Technology
Prof. Dr.V.Kumaresan
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court