Disposed¶25

S. Arulprakasam v. Mr. Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S

Madras HC4 Apr 2025CONT P/347/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of Court Act Section 11; Madras High Court; Cont.P.No.347 of 2024; violation of order in WMP.No.16153 of 2023 in W.P.No.16943 of 2023 dated 18.07.2023; Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board; compliance reported; travelling allowance representation; contempt petition closed for the present; no punishment imposed.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for both sides (that the Court's earlier order had been complied with), the Contempt Petition is closed for the present; no punishment is imposed. ¶25

S. Arulprakasam Vs Mr. Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.No.347 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED 04.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Cont.P.No.347 of 2024

S.Arulprakasam

... Petitioner

Mr.Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S., Principal secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Departmet, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

Dr.S.Suresh Kumar, I.A.S., Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.

¶12

Mr.S.Chandrasekaran, Assistant Director, Khadi and Village Industries, Anna Pattumaaligai, Salem – 636 001. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondents for wilfully and deliberately violating the Order of this Court in WMP.No.16153 of 2023 in W.P.No.16943 of 2023 dated 18.07.2023.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader – R1 Mr.C.Rajakumar – R2 & R3

¶16

1/2

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Cont.P.No.347 of 2024

¶19

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶20

vrc

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Heard Mr.Balan Haridas, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Balathandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and Mr.C.Rajakumar, learned counsel appearing for the second and third respondents.

¶23

When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing

¶24

for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the Order of this Court has been complied. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he has not received travelling allowance and he will make representation in this regard.

¶25