Disposed

Mrs. Thangammal v. Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade

Madras HC21 Mar 2025CONT P/2905/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act was heard. The respondents informed the court that the order dated 21.12.2023 in the underlying writ petition had been complied with and filed a compliance report. The court accepted the explanation and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed as the respondents had complied with the court order.

Mrs. Thangammal Vs Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 21-03-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN

¶6

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶7

¶8

W.P.No.25891 of 2018

¶9

Mrs. Thangammal W/o. Mr. Chitharanjan, No.20/36, Jambuli Avenue Colony, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600 118.

¶10

Petitioner(s)

¶11

¶12

Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, Chennai District Collector, Singaravelar Maligai, No. 62, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

¶13

2.Thiru. J. Radhakrishnan, Commissioner, Corporation of Greater Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai 600 003.

¶14

Contemnor(s)

¶15

PRAYER: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for their gross and wilful act of Contempt of Court and for their willful and deliberate failure to comply with the direction of this Court dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P.No. 25891 of 2018.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶18

For Petitioner(s): M/s. B. Harikrishnan,

¶19

For Contemnor(s): Mr.A.Selvendran,spl Government Pleader For R1 Mr.S.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel For R2

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner has filed this contempt petition, to punish the respondents

¶22

for disobeying the order of this Court dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P.No.

¶23

25891 of 2018.

¶24

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is informed by the learned

¶25

Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and the learned

¶26

Standing counsel appearing for the second respondent that the order of this

¶27

Court dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P.No. 25891 of 2018 has been complied

¶28

with and also filed the compliance report to that effect.

¶29

Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

21-03-2025

mfa

Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶38

¶39

1.Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, Chennai District Collector, Singaravelar Maligai, No. 62, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

¶40

2.Thiru. J. Radhakrishnan, Commissioner, Corporation of Greater Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai 600 003.

¶41

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024

¶44

P.VELMURUGAN J

¶45

mfa

¶46

CONT P No. 2905 of 2024 in W.P.No.25891 of 2018

¶47

21-03-2025

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mrs. Thangammal v. Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Thangammal v. Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Samya Vs the Inspector of Police (Crime)

Nalini @ Vijaya, Vs Sub Inspector of Police

P.Amaresan Vs S.Sumathi @ Hemalatha

P. Murugesan Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

K. C. Jayabalan Vs Siddiq, and 4 others

Syed Ahmed Kabeer Vs S.Arunraj I.a.S., and Another