A. Mohandoss, Advocate v. P. Vikash Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Short order of the Madras High Court dated 07-11-2025 in CONT.A Nos. 29 & 30 of 2025 (with CMP.Nos.16296 to 16299 of 2025 and CMP.No.17456 of 2025), made by M.S. Ramesh J. with V. Lakshminarayanan J. on the bench. On a 'for being mentioned' listing sought by the appellant's counsel, the Court found that a Review Application had already been filed and that no clarification was required. Parties: A. Mohandoss, Advocate (appellant) v. P. Vikash Kumar and another. Counsel: N.L. Rajah, senior counsel, with G. Anandaraj (for appellant); K.K. Sanchetii (for R1); C.K. Chandrasekar (for R2). Copy addressed to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. No statutory provisions or precedents are cited.
What did the court decide?
As a Review Application has already been filed in the matter, no clarification is required. ¶9