Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of an earlier writ order against a bank branch manager. Counsel for the respondent represented that the underlying writ order had been complied with; the court thereupon closed the contempt petition without any further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.2757 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Contempt Petition No.2757 of 2025
Kaviya Udhayakumar ... Petitioner
Vs. Mr.Rajkumar Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Mayiladuthurai Branch, Mahadhana Street, Mayiladuthurai – 609 001. ... Respondent
Prayer :
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.9344 of 2024 dated 23.10.2024 in accordance with the provisions of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution of India.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Harikrishnan for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates For Respondent : Mr.T.Sundara Rajan
1/3
Contempt Petition No.2757 of 2025
M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the
order dated 23.10.2024 made in W.P.No.9344 of 2024.
2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9344 of 2024, which is the subject matter of contempt was complied with.
3.In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed.
14.11.2025
pri Index: Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No
Contempt Petition No.2757 of 2025
2/3
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kaviya Udhayakumar
Mr.Rajkumar Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Mayiladuthurai Branch
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
