Disposed¶25

S. Indu Priya, v. Mr. S. Kannappan and 2 others

Madras HC15 Apr 2025CONT P/245/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Cont.P.No.245 of 2025, S.Indu Priya vs S.Kannappan (Director of School Education) and others; contempt petition under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act for alleged willful disobedience of order in W.P.No.25423 of 2019 dated 14.07.2023; compliance reported by Additional Advocate General (appointment to post of Junior Assistant); contempt petition closed; R.N. Manjula, J.; decided 15.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

On the respondents' submission, with supporting proceedings placed before the Court, that the order in W.P.No.25423 of 2019 dated 14.07.2023 had been complied with and the petitioner appointed to the post of Junior Assistant, the Court closed the Contempt Petition. ¶25

S. Indu Priya, Vs Mr. S. Kannappan and 2 others — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.No.245 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

Cont.P.No.245 of 2025

S.Indu Priya

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Mr.S.Kannappan,

Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶12

2.Mr.Dayalan,

¶13

District Elementary Educational Officer, Vellore.

¶14

3.Mrs.Premalatha, District Educational Officer, Arakkonam, Vellore District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25423 of 2019 dated 14.07.2023.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan, AAG assisted by Mr.C.Jayaprakash, GA

¶18

Page No.1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Cont.P.No.245 of 2025

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents

¶23

for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25423 of 2019 dated 14.07.2023.

¶24

2 . The learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents submitted that the order of this Court has been complied and the petitioner has been appointed to the post of Junior Assistant. He has also produced the proceedings in this regard before this Court.

¶25

3 . In view of the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶26

Index : Yes /No 15.04.2025 Internet : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking gsk

¶27

Page No.2 of 4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Cont.P.No.245 of 2025

¶30

¶31