Disposed¶20

Kms Green Energy India Pvt. Ltd., v. K.Radhakrishnan Ias., and 2 others

Madras HC4 Jul 2025CONT P/2026/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Cont.P.No.2026 of 2025, decided 04.07.2025 by N.ANAND VENKATESH J. Contempt petition (S.11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971) by M/s KMS Green Energy India Pvt.Ltd. v TANGEDCO officials K.Radhakrishnan (Chairman), R.K.Vinothan (Chief Engineer NCES) and D.Rajendran (Director Generation), alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.28372 of 2024; petition closed on recording compliance reported by both counsel; no sanction, no quantum, no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

None; the contempt petition stands closed after the Court recorded that the earlier order had been duly complied with, and no contempt sanction was imposed. ¶20

Kms Green Energy India Pvt. Ltd., Vs K.Radhakrishnan Ias… — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Cont.P.No.2026 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 04.07.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Contempt Petition No.2026 of 2025

¶7

M/s KMS Green Energy India Pvt.Ltd., 147-B, 6^th Street, Sakthi Nagar West Thindal, Erode 638 012 rep.by its Authorised Signatory C.Ragupathi .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

Thiru.K.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S The Chairman Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

¶10

R.K.Vinothan Chief Engineer Non Conventional Energy Sources Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

¶11

D.Rajendran Director Generation TANGEDCO 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 .. Respondents

¶12

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Cont.P.No.2026 of 2025

¶15

Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.09.2024 made in W.P.No.28372 of 2024.

¶16

For Petitioner :: Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents :: Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar Standing Counsel

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, it was stated by both

¶19

the learned counsel for petitioner and the respondents that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with.

¶20