Allowed¶25

The Divisional Manager v. S.Ravichandran

Madras HC14 Jul 2025CMP(MD)/9802/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay 703 days; CMP.(MD)No.9802 of 2025; C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.49236 of 2023; United India Insurance Co.; Order IV Rule 9(4) A.S.Rules; M.C.O.P.No.552 of 2020; Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Thanjavur; conditional condonation subject to deposit of entire decree amount within two weeks; compliance reporting 30.07.2025; Justice K.K.Ramakrishnan; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; decided 14.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 703 days in representing C.M.A.(MD).SR.No.49236 of 2023 condoned, on condition that the petitioner deposits the entire decree amount within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; case listed on 30.07.2025 for 'reporting compliance'. ¶25

The Divisional Manager Vs S.Ravichandran — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP.(MD)No.9802 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :14.07.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

CMP.(MD)No.9802 of 2025 and C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.49236 of 2023

¶7

The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Co., Ltd, LIC Building Campus, Gandhiji Road, Thanjavur .. Petitioner

Vs.

1.S.Ravichandran

2.S.Elangovan

3.K.Mahalakshmi .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of the A.S.Rules, to condone the delay of 703 days in representing the above C.M.A.(MD). SR.No.49236 of 2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Karthik

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 703

¶16

days in representing the above C.M.A.(MD).SR.No.49236 of 2023.

¶17

1/3

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CMP.(MD)No.9802 of 2025

¶20

2.The insurance company has filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal

¶21

against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.552 of 2020 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Special District Judge, Thanjavur.

¶22

3.The learned counsel appearing for the insurance company would submit that

¶23

they have challenged the liability alone. The third respondent is the contesting respondent who has been served with notice.

¶24

4.Mr.Ganapathi Raman, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat, on behalf of the third respondent.

¶25

This Court perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this petition is allowed on condition to deposit the entire decree amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶26