D.Rajaseeli, v. a.Anjalo Jeyapaul,(Died) 2. S.Punitha
Case brief
What is this about?
CMP(MD)Nos.9379, 9380 ad 9381 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.755 of 2016; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice P.Vadamalai; decided 04.11.2025; condonation of 877-day delay; setting aside of abatement following death of sole respondent A.Anjalo Jeyapaul; impleadment of legal representatives S.Punitha and A.Triphi as respondents 2 and 3; Section 5 of Limitation Act; Order 22 Rule 9 r/w Section 151 CPC; Order 22 Rule 3(1) r/w Rule 11 CPC; petitioner D.Rajaseeli W/o.Iruthayaraj; counsel Mr.H.Arumugam; second respondent S.Punitha party-in-person with no objection; third respondent A.Triphi no appearance; Registry directed to amend main Second Appeal; next listing 05.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 877 days in filing the petition to set aside abatement condoned; abatement caused by the death of sole respondent A.Anjalo Jeyapaul set aside; S.Punitha and A.Triphi brought on record as legal representatives (respondents 2 & 3) in S.A(MD)No.755 of 2016; Registry directed to amend the main Second Appeal and list the matter on 05.12.2025.