Allowed

The Revenue Divisional Officer v. K.Elango

Madras HC4 Mar 2025CMP(MD)/7857/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to condone a 193-day delay in filing a writ appeal. The court found the reasons satisfactory and condoned the delay subject to payment of Rs.1,000 as costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee, failing which the petition would stand automatically dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 193 days in filing the writ appeal condoned on payment of Rs.1,000 costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Madurai Bench.

The Revenue Divisional Officer Vs K.Elango — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.7857 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and

¶6

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

C.M.P.(MD)No.7857 of 2019 in W.A.(MD)No.SR 60408 of 2019

¶8

1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KARUR REVENUE OFFICE, KARUR DISTRICT.

¶9

2 THE TAHSILDAR ARAVAKURICHI TALUK, KARUR DISTRICT.

¶10

... PETITIONERS

¶11

¶12

K.ELANGO ... RESPONDENT

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader for Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan,

¶14

For Respondent : No appearance

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)

¶17

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 193 days in filing the above Writ Appeal.

¶18

2.Heard the learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners. Though https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/3

¶20

CMP(MD) No.7857 of 2019

¶21

notice has been served on the respondent, none appeared on his behalf.

¶22

3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this

¶23

petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 193 days, however, on payment of costs.

¶24

4.Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on payment

¶25

of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee attached to this Bench forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order, failing

¶26

which this petition will be dismissed automatically without any further reference to

this Court.

sd/04/03/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/03/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

COPY TO: THE OFFICER INCHARGE, HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

2/3

¶37

CMP(MD) No.7857 of 2019

¶38

ORDER IN C.M.P.(MD)No.7857 of 2019 in W.A.(MD)No.SR 60408 of 2019 Date :04/03/2025

¶39

MK/VR/SAR /12.03.2025 3P/2C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

3/3

The Revenue Divisional Officer v. K.Elango

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Revenue Divisional Officer v. K.Elango

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kolappan Asari Vs The District Collector / Monitoring Committee

The District Collector Vs a Subramaniam

P.Murugesan Vs Shankar Jiwal Ips.

V.Dharmaraj Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

Sasi Pramila.K Vs the Administrator

The Registrar(Judicial) Vs the Home Secretary