Disposed¶25

Arockiyadoss v. No.1 Joint Sub Registrar

Madras HC12 Jun 2025CMP(MD)/5482/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Third party writ appeal; leave petition under Article 226; CMP(MD) 5482 of 2025 in WA(MD) SR 26344 of 2025; challenge to order dated 13.11.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.26984 of 2024; refusal check slip set aside; registration of rental agreement; Joint Sub Registrar Periyakulam, Theni District; existing agreement holder; rights of third party not affected by registration; defend in manner known to law; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; G.R. Swaminathan J.; petition disposed with clarificatory observation.

What did the court decide?

The Court made it clear that the registration of the document submitted by the writ petitioner will not, by itself, in any way affect the rights of the appellant. ¶24

Arockiyadoss Vs No.1 Joint Sub Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 5482 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12-06-2025

¶3

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶4

CMP(MD) NO. 5482 of 2025 IN WA(MD) SR NO. 26344 OF 2025

¶5

Arockiyadoss

¶6

S/o. Mariya Fransis, J.R.R.Nagar, Vaigai Road, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

No.1 Joint Sub Registrar Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Respondent(s)

¶10

Prayer: Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to grant leave to file third party writ appeal against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.26984 of 2024, dated 13.11.2024.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.G.Thalaimuthurasu

For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Saji Bhino Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy for R2

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble G.R.SWAMINATHAN J.)

¶17

The writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 13.11.2024 made in W.P.

¶18

1/3

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CMP(MD) NO. 5482 of 2025

¶21

(MD)No.26984 of 2024. Since the appellant herein is not a party to the writ proceedings, this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed.

¶22

It is seen that the writ petitioner submitted rental agreement for registration.

¶23

The registration was refused. Challenging the refusal check slip, the petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.26984 of 2024. The learned single Judge citing the earlier precedents set

¶24

aside the refusal check slip and directed the registering authority to register the document on it being re-presented. The grievance of the appellant herein is that he is an existing agreement holder and that in suppression of the same, the order has been obtained. We make it clear that the registration of the document submitted by the writ petitioner will not in any way by itself affect the rights of the appellant herein. As and when the appellant's rights are sought to be affected, the appellant can defend himself in the manner known to law.

¶25