A civil miscellaneous petition arising in a pending appeal suit came before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. Observing that counsel had not been helpful, the bench dismissed the petition but permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file a fresh CMP.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN CMP(MD) No.3352 of 2025 in AS(MD) No.19 of 2016
... PETITIONER(S)
Vs
1 C.VADIVEL,
2 PAPAPATHI (DIED)
3 K.KALYANASUNDARAM
4 TAMILSELVI
5 KALAISELVI 6 JAYAKUMAR
7 MANIKANDAN For Petitioners: S.Ramakrishnan, Advocate For Respondents:
... RESPONDENT(S)
Mr.R.Sundar Srinivasan for R1
1/2
ORDER
The learned Counsel has not at all been helpful.
This Petition is dismissed. Liberty is given to file a fresh CMP.
sd/06/03/2025
/ TRUE COPY /
/03/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
das TO
The 1st Additional District Judge, (PCR), Tiruchirapalli.
ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.3352 of 2025 in AS(MD) No.19 of 2016 Date :06/03/2025
NBF / VR /SAR- (12/03/2025) 2P/2C
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 17/07/2023
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the civil miscellaneous petition filed in the pending appeal suit be entertained?
Thailammai (Died)
C.Mayandi
C.Vadivel
Papapathi (Died)
K.Kalyanasundaram
Tamilselvi
G.R.Swaminathan
M.Jothiraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
