Dismissed

C.Tamizhan v. a.Muthuraman

Madras HC22 Jan 2025CMP(MD)/322/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought leave to file a writ appeal against an order in a single-judge writ petition concerning what appears to be a property dispute. With counsel's endorsement, the miscellaneous petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek leave to file a review before the learned Single Judge.

What did the court decide?

CMP dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file review leave application; W.A. (MD) SR No.96539 of 2024 rejected.

C.Tamizhan Vs a.Muthuraman — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.01.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025 in

¶7

W.A.(MD).SR.No.96539 of 2024

¶8

1.C.Tamizhan

¶9

2.C.Barathi

¶10

3.C.Paneer @ Paneer Selvam ... Petitioners/Appellants

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.A.Muthuraman

¶13

2.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶14

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶15

4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk Office, Madurai District. ... Respondents/Respondents

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025

¶19

PRAYER in C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to grant leave to prefer Writ Appeal against the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.24793 of 2023 dated 21.12.2023.

¶20

PRAYER in W.A.(MD).SR.No.96539 of 2024: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order passed in W.P. (MD).No.24793 of 2023 dated 21.12.2023 and allow the Writ Appeal.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.T.C.S.Thillainayagam For R-2 to R-4 : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.)

¶24

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

¶25

the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an application seeking leave to file a review application before

¶26

the learned Single Judge. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶27

Recording the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed

¶28

as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file an application seeking leave

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025

¶32

to file a review application before the learned Single Judge. Consequently,

¶33

W.A.(MD).SR.No.96539 of 2024 stands rejected.

¶34

(M.S.R.,J.) (A.D.M.C.,J.) 22.01.2025

¶35

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm

¶36

¶37

1.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶38

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶39

3.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk Office, Madurai District.

¶40

Page 3 of 4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025

¶43

M.S.RAMESH,J. and A.D.MARIA CLETE,J.

¶44

¶45

C.M.P.(MD).No.322 of 2025 in W.A.(MD).SR.No.96539 of 2024

¶46

22.01.2025

¶47

Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Tamizhan v. a.Muthuraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Tamizhan v. a.Muthuraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Indian Bank Vs M/s.Sri Kondaiya Modern Rice Mill (Borrower)

Prabakaran Vs The District Collector

The Principal Secretary/Industries Commissioner Vs P.Kamatchiraj

Janakiraman Vs The Director

Abdul Wahab Vs The Executive Officer

P. Gunasekaran Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu