Allowed

Subiramani v. C.Kanchana

Madras HC8 Dec 2025CMP(MD)/19375/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A restoration petition seeking reinstatement of a civil miscellaneous appeal that had been dismissed earlier. Satisfied with the affidavit's reasons and noting the petition was consequential, the court allowed it and directed the Registry to restore the appeal and list it in the usual course.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Registry to restore CMA(MD)No.110 of 2025 and list it in the usual course.

Subiramani Vs C.Kanchana — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08-12-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶5

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025

¶6

¶7

CMA(MD) NO. 110 of 2025

Subiramani

Petitioner(s)

1.C.Kanchana

2.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company, 54-A, Mythili Nivas, Palani Road, Dindigul

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

For Petitioner(s):

¶15

Mr.S.Pugalendhi, Advocate

¶16

For Respondent(s):

¶17

No Appearance

¶18

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to restore the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.110 of 2025, which was dismissed on 27.03.2025 by this Court.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to restore the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.110 of 2025, which was dismissed on 27.03.2025 by this Court.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and I have perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶25

The 1^st respondent remained ex parte before the lower Court, and there is no representation for the 2^nd respondent.

¶26

The delay of 107 days in preferring the present restoration petition was already condoned by this Court on 21.11.2025 in C.M.P. (MD)No.13711 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)No.110 of 2025.

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025

¶30

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, and also

¶31

considering the fact that this is only a consequential petition, this Civil

¶32

Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶33

08.12.2025

¶34

Note : The Registry is directed to restore the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.110 of 2025 and list the same in the usual course.

¶35

mkn

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025

¶39

P.VADAMALAI, J.

¶40

mkn

¶41

CMP(MD) NO. 19375 of 2025 in CMA(MD) NO. 110 of 2025

¶42

08.12.2025

¶43

4/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Subiramani v. C.Kanchana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subiramani v. C.Kanchana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sterling Spinners Limited, Vs The Assistant Regional Director

M/S. Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs S.Ponnammal

V.Manickavasagam, Vs Kanniyammal (Died)

C.Govindharaj Vs D.Madhusudhanan

The Branch Manager Vs Minor.Vanshika

M/s.Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs K.Vijayan