Seenisamy v. Perumal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought condonation of a 105-day delay in representing their second appeal against judgments upholding a decree in their property dispute. Satisfied with the reasons in the affidavit, the court allowed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 105 days in representing SA(MD)SR No.55726 of 2025 condoned.
What the court decided
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 105-day delay in representing the Second Appeal should be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Seenisamy
- petitioner
Thirupathi
- respondent
Perumal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court