Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S.P.Jeyalakshmi Vs P.Gowri — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

Home
Madras HC
2025
S.P.Jeyalakshmi Vs P.GowriS.P.Jeyalakshmi v. P.Gowri

Dismissed¶31

S.P.Jeyalakshmi v. P.Gowri

Madras HC9 Dec 2025CMP(MD)/18607/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Civil Miscellaneous Petition permitted on counsel's endorsement; CMP dismissed as withdrawn; consequential rejection of Civil Revision Petition C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025 at SR stage itself; CRP under Article 227 of Constitution of India against order in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 of Subordinate Court, Periakulam (date recorded variously as 06.10.2023 and 06.10.2025); CMP under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code; original suit disposed of; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice N. Senthilkumar; decision dated 09.12.2025; petitioners S.P.Jeyalakshmi, P.Prema, P.Uma, P.Balakesan, P.Murugesan, P.Ramaprabha; respondents P.Gowri, District Collector Theni, Tahsildar Periakulam, Joint Registrar Batlagundu.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition; the CMP dismissed as withdrawn and, consequently, the Civil Revision Petition rejected at the SR stage itself; no costs.

Why is it important?

Permission is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition, on the submission of learned counsel and the endorsement made by him that the original suit itself has been disposed of. ¶27

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission granted to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition; the CMP dismissed as withdrawn and, consequently, the Civil Revision Petition rejected at the SR stage itself; no costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition (with the consequential rejection of the Civil Revision Petition at the SR stage), the original suit itself having been disposed of.

Court's answer

Permission is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition, on the submission of learned counsel and the endorsement made by him that the original suit itself has been disposed of.

Ratio / Principle

Recording the submission and endorsement, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and, consequently, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected at the SR stage itself, with no costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (N. Senthilkumar, J.), 09.12.2025 — C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025 in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025: The petitioners filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code to accept the cause title of a Civil Revision Petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 of the Subordinate Court, Periakulam. At hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition stating that the original suit itself had been disposed of, and made an endorsement to that effect. Permission was granted; the CMP was dismissed as withdrawn and, consequently, the Civil Revision Petition was rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs.

A

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 09.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025 in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025 and C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025

1.S.P.Jeyalakshmi

2.P.Prema

3.P.Uma

4.P.Balakesan

5.P.Murugesan (Petitioners 4 and 5 are represented by through their power of attorney P.Jeyakesan)

6.P.Ramaprabha

... Petitioners

-vs.-

1.P.Gowri

2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Theni, Theni District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District.

Page 1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The Joint Registrar, Joint Registrar's Office, Batlagundu.

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025

...Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to accept the cause title as shown in the Civil Revision Petition filed against the order, dated 06.10.2023 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 by the Subordinate Court, Periakulam.

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order, dated 06.10.2025 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 by Subordinate Court, Periakulam and allow the Civil Revision Petition.

For Petitioners :Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For R2 to R5 :Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate *****

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, as the original suit itself has been disposed of. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted.

Page 2 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025

2.Recording the submission as well as the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected at SR stage itself. No costs.

09.12.2025 Internet :Yes/No (1/2) NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No cmr To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Periakulam.

2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Theni, Theni District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District.

4.The Joint Registrar, Joint Registrar's Office, Batlagundu.

________________ Page 3 of 5_

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025

Page 4 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

cmr

C.M.P.(MD)No.18607 of 2025 in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025 and C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.97850 of 2025

09.12.2025 (1/2)

________________ Page 5 of 5_

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition (with the consequential rejection of the Civil Revision Petition at the SR stage), the original suit itself having been disposed of.medium confidence¶27
The court held
Permission is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition, on the submission of learned counsel and the endorsement made by him that the original suit itself has been disposed of.ratio¶27

Statutes considered

2 provisions across 2 enactments

AI extract

Civil Procedure CodeSection 115¶23
Constitution of IndiaArticle 227¶24

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 passed by the Subordinate Court, Periakulam, sought to be set aside by the Civil Revision Petition (the CMP prayer records the date as 06.10.2023 while the CRP prayer records it as 06.10.2025).¶24
Subordinate Court, Periakulam · 06.10.2025
Prior proceeding
Interlocutory Application I.A.No.3 of 2025 filed in Suit O.S.No.82 of 2025 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Periakulam.¶24
Prior proceeding
Filing of the Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code to accept the cause title as shown in the Civil Revision Petition, the latter being filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.¶23
Prior proceeding
At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the original suit itself has been disposed of, sought permission to withdraw the CMP, and made an endorsement to that effect.¶27

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
S.P.Jeyalakshmi¶7
S.Anand Chandrasekar
petitioner
P.Prema¶8
S.Anand Chandrasekar
petitioner
P.Uma¶9
S.Anand Chandrasekar
petitioner
P.Balakesan¶10
S.Anand Chandrasekar
petitioner
P.Murugesan¶11
S.Anand Chandrasekar
petitioner
P.Ramaprabha¶12
S.Anand Chandrasekar
respondent
P.Gowri¶15
respondent
The District Collector, District Collector Office, Theni, Theni District¶16
P.Thambidurai
respondent
The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District¶17
P.Thambidurai
respondent
The Joint Registrar, Joint Registrar's Office, Batlagundu¶20
P.Thambidurai

Coram

AI extract

N.Senthilkumarauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 9 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 17 Nov 2025
Case no.: CMP(MD)/18607/2025
CNR: HCMD011642922025
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: N.senthilkumar
Disposal: WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Case type: C.M.P.(MD)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from N.senthilkumar

J.Sundar Raja Vs G.Kasthuri
8 Dec 2025
V.Govindan Vs v.gopal
8 Dec 2025
Sundaram Vs Krishnan
8 Dec 2025
Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust Vs Nil
9 Dec 2025
R. Rajeshwaran Vs Agalya
9 Dec 2025
C.Ilamaran Vs a.Muthulakshmi
9 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

S.P.Jeyalakshmi v. P.Gowri, CMP(MD)/18607/2025 (MAD), decided on 9 December 2025.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes2

Civil Procedure CodeSection 115
Constitution of IndiaArticle 227

View all statutes

Procedural history4

Order in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.82 of 2025 passed by the Subordinate Court, Periakulam, sought to be set aside by the Civil Revision Petition (the CMP prayer records the date as 06.10.2023 while the CRP prayer records it as 06.10.2025).Subordinate Court, Periakulam · 06.10.2025
Interlocutory Application I.A.No.3 of 2025 filed in Suit O.S.No.82 of 2025 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Periakulam.
Filing of the Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code to accept the cause title as shown in the Civil Revision Petition, the latter being filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

View full history

Bench / Coram

N.Senthilkumar

Parties & counsel