Allowed

N.Balavenkatesh v. The Director/Distribution

Madras HC6 Mar 2025CMP(MD)/17461/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to condone a 109-day delay in filing a writ appeal against respondents in an electricity distribution service matter. The court condoned the delay, noting no objection from respondents, subject to payment of Rs.500 costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 109 days in filing the writ appeal condoned on payment of Rs.500 to the High Court Legal Services Committee.

N.Balavenkatesh Vs The Director/Distribution — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.17461 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and

¶6

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

CMP(MD) No.17461 of 2024 in

¶8

WA(MD) No.SR 80364 of 2024

¶9

N.BALAVENKATESH OFFICE HELPER, O/O. THANJAVUR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE, THANJAVUR.

¶10

... PETITIONER(S)

¶11

¶12

1 THE DIRECTOR/DISTRIBUTION ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH, N.P.K.R.R. MALIGAI, NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 600 002.

¶13

2 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, THANJAVUR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE, THANJAVUR. ... RESPONDENT(S) For Petitioner: M/s.s.Esairani Narasiman, Advocate For Respondents: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R1 and R2

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/3

¶16

CMP(MD) No.17461 of 2024

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)

¶19

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 109 days in filing the above Writ Appeal.

¶20

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondents.

¶21

3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and taking into consideration that the respondents have got no objection to condone the delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 109 days, however, on payment of costs.

¶22

4.Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on payment of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee attached to this Bench forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order, failing which this petition will be dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

sd/06/03/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/04/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/3

¶29

CMP(MD) No.17461 of 2024

¶30

¶31

¶32

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.17461 of 2024 in WA(MD) No.SR 80364 of 2024 Date :06/03/2025

¶34

NBF/GSV/ SAR/ (01/04/2025) 3P/2C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/3

N.Balavenkatesh v. The Director/Distribution

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Balavenkatesh v. The Director/Distribution

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Transport Commissioner Vs R.Ravichandran

Velraj Vs The District Collector

The Managing Director Vs G. Parthasarathy

The Chief Educational Officer Vs G.Arunadevi

The District Collector Vs T. Cibi Chakraborthy

K.Gunalan Vs The District Collector