Allowed¶57

A.Maanrajan v. 1.A. Balasubramanian (Died) 2. Pounrajan

Madras HC27 Oct 2025CMP(MD)/17353/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 308 days delay; re-presentation of SR papers; CMP(MD)SR No.46910 of 2024; CMP(MD)SR No.46910 of 2025; A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021; Order 4 Rule 9 AS Rules; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; C.V.Karthikeyan; R.Vijayakumar; K.Guhan; 27.10.2025; Registry numbering direction

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 308-day delay in representing the CMP SR; Registry directed to number the petition if otherwise in order. ¶57

A.Maanrajan Vs 1.A. Balasubramanian (Died) 2. Pounrajan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P.(MD)No.17353 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :27.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

C.M.P.(MD)No.17353 of 2025 in A.S.(MD).No.9 of 2021

1.A.Maanrajan

2.A.M.Muthukumar

3.A.M.Prabhukumar

... Petitioners

-vs-

1.A.Balasubramanian (Died)

¶13

2.Pounrajan

¶14

3.N.Banumathi Devi

¶15

4.A.N.Jeyakumar

¶16

5.A.Sridevi

¶17

6.Vijaylakshmi

¶18

7.Rajakumari

¶19

8.K.Santha

¶20

_____________ Page 1 of 5_

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

C.M.P.(MD)No.17353 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021

9.K.Kanimurugan

10.Chitraseemati

11.Latha

12.Bharani

13.Gowri

14.A.K.Balamurugan

15.Sasikala

16.Kavitha

17.Jansi

18.B.Ushadevi

19.V.Selvanayaki

20.K.Shanthi

21.T.Bharth

22.T.Pavithran

23.Rajesh Kumar

24.Prabanjan

25.Thangapappa

26.A.Sivakumar

_____________ Page 2 of 5_

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

C.M.P.(MD)No.17353 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021

27.Kalairasi

28.Anbu Lakshmi

... Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Order 4 Rule 9 of AS Rules praying to condone the delay of 308 days in representing the C.M.P.SR(MD)No. 46910 of 2024 in A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021.

¶48

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan

¶49

O R D E R

¶50

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.)

¶51

This application has been filed to condone the delay of 308 days in representing the CMP(MD)SR No.46910 of 2025.

¶52

2. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it had been stated that the papers had been returned for various compliances and necessary steps have to be obtained for the said compliances.

¶53

_____________ Page 3 of 5_

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

C.M.P.(MD)No.17353 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)No.9 of 2021

¶56

3 . At any rate, taking into consideration all these facts, the

¶57

delay is condoned and the petition is allowed. Registry is directed to

¶58

proceed further in numbering the petition, if it is otherwise in order.