Allowed

Indhumathi v. Arul Pragasam

Madras HC8 Dec 2025CMP(MD)/17073/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner sought leave under Section 151 CPC to file a writ appeal against an earlier writ order directing registration of a settlement deed allegedly executed without title and obtained behind her back. Citing a subsequent Revenue Divisional Officer order cancelling patta, the court granted leave and directed numbering of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to file W.A.(MD) SR No.88407 of 2025; Registry directed to number the appeal and list for admission.

Indhumathi Vs Arul Pragasam — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR No.88407 of 2025

Indhumathi

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.Arul Pragasam

2.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Register Office, Kommdikottai, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to grant leave to file the above Writ Appeal against the order dated 30.07.2025 made in W.P.(MD)No.20933 of 2025.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vasik Ali

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Badurus Zaman, Govt. Advocate for R2

¶15

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025

¶19

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

¶20

The case of the petitioner is that behind the back, the Writ Petitioner

¶21

has obtained a positive direction from this Court to the Sub Registrar for registration of a settlement deed executed without title.

¶22

2 . The learned counsel, referring the order passed by the Revenue

¶23

Divisional Officer dated 06.11.2025, indicating the patta issued in the name of the Writ Petitioner cancelled and patta proceedings in favour of the third party appellant, has changed the entire gamete of the litigation.

¶24

3. Hence, leave granted and accordingly, this application is allowed.

¶25

Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal and list the matter for admission.

¶26

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]

¶27

08.12.2025

¶28

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm

¶29

_____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025

¶32

To:

¶33

The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Register Office, Kommdikottai, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District.

¶34

_____________ Page 3 of 4_

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025

¶37

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

¶38

vsm

¶39

C.M.P.(MD) No.17073 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR No.88407 of 2025

¶40

08.12.2025

¶41

_____________ Page 4 of 4_

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Indhumathi v. Arul Pragasam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indhumathi v. Arul Pragasam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Manikandan Poosari Vs P.Seethalakshmi

The State Government of Tamil Nadu Vs N.Chitrarasu

Pappa Vs Axelin Thiraviyam

S.Amalraj Vs C.Sivakumar

S.Rm.Nachiappan Vs The District Revenue Officer

Mohamed Zakariya S S Vs The Authorised Officer