Petition to condone a 100-day delay in representing an appeal suit before the Madras High Court. Accepting the reasons in the supporting affidavit, the Court condoned the delay, allowed the petition, and directed the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.(MD)No.16067 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)SR.No.40497 of 2025
C.M.P.(MD)No.16067 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)SR.No.40497 of 2025
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J .)
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 100 days in representing the above appeal in A.S.(MD)SR.No.40497 of 2025.
2. In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of
this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.
3. Registry is directed to number the Appeal Suit if it is otherwise
in order.
[C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.]
vsm
26.09.2025
_____________ Page 1 of 2_
C.M.P.(MD)No.16067 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)SR.No.40497 of 2025
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
vsm
C.M.P.(MD)No.16067 of 2025 in A.S.(MD)SR.No.40497 of 2025
26.09.2025
_____________ Page 2 of 2_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 100-day delay in representing the appeal should be condoned.
C.V.Karthikeyan
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
