Sankaralingam v. Kanagaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court condoned a 33-day delay in filing a second appeal challenging a subordinate court judgment/decree.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 33 days in filing second appeal to be condoned; appeal numbered and listed for admission.
What the court decided
C.M.P.(MD) No.14929 of 2025 in S.A.(MD)SR.No.52114 of 2018
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 33 days in filing the second appeal, challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.83 of 2017 dated 07.08.2018 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC), Palani, reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No. 130 of 2011 dated 24.09.2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ottanchathiram.
- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
- The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that they are not having any objections to condone the delay.
- Considering the reasons assigned and also the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list it for admission in the usual course.
09.12.2025
csm
Coram
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court