Manivel, v. Ramasamy (Died) 2. Thangaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Condonation of delay 55 days Section 5 Limitation Act; set aside abatement caused by death of first respondent Ramasamy; Order 22 Rule 9(2) CPC (cited as '22 Rule 9(2)'); Order 22 Rule 4 CPC bring legal representatives on record as respondents 3 and 4; petitions withdrawn with counsel endorsement and dismissed as withdrawn; Manivel, Manikandan and Manimakudan petitioners; M.P. Senthil for petitioners; M.R. Sreenivasan for R2 Thangaraj; no appearance for R1; parent appeal S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 under Section 100 CPC against A.S.No.17 of 2009 judgment dated 07.01.2010 by Additional District Judge Fast Track Court Dindigul confirming O.S.No.158 of 2001 judgment dated 15.11.2007 by Additional Subordinate Judge Dindigul; no cases cited; single-judge order by Justice K. Murali Shankar dated 15.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petitions; the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions were dismissed as withdrawn and no substantive relief (delay condonation, setting aside of abatement, or admission of legal representatives) was granted.