Allowed¶33

G.Mythili v. The Commissioner

Madras HC17 Jul 2025CMP(MD)/10262/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court Madurai Bench; CMP(MD) 10262 of 2025 in CMP(MD) 3322 of 2025 in WA(MD)SR 57720 of 2024; G.Mythili v. Commissioner, HR&CE and others; Section 5 Limitation Act; restoration of dismissed civil miscellaneous petition; condonation of delay 859 days; review against order dated 17.03.2021 in WP(MD) 7486 of 2020; clause 15 Letter Patent Act writ appeal; Article 226 mandamus; 10% interest on gratuity; Assistant Commissioner of Labour Madurai Panikodai orders; Arulmigu Ramanathasamy Thirukoil Rameswaram; HR&CE; petition allowed 17/07/2025.

What did the court decide?

CMP(MD). No.10262 of 2025 allowed; restoration of C.M.P.(MD).3322/2025 in W.A.(MD).SR.No.57720 of 2025 granted as sought in the petition. ¶33

G.Mythili Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶2

Thursday, the Seventeenth day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

CMP(MD). No.10262 of 2025 IN CMP(MD).NO.3322 OF 2025 IN WA(MD)SR.NO.57720 OF 2024

¶7

G.Mythili ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant

¶8

¶9

1 The Commissioner

¶10

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Administration Numgampakkam High Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶11

2 The Joint Commissioner/executive Officer Arulmigu Ramanathasamy Thirukoil Rameswaram.

3 R.Viswanathan

4 R.M.Pandi

5 B.Karuppiah

6 N.Gandhi

7 R.Vedarajan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8 A.Madhavan

9 P.Kumaresan

10 S.Maarie

11 R.Dharmarajan ... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents

¶22

Prayer in CMP(MD) 10262 of 2025 :-

¶23

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act,to restore the C.M.P.(MD).3322/2025 in W.A.(MD).SR.No.57720 of 2025 on the file of this Court which was dismissed on 01-04-2025.

¶24

Prayer in CMP(MD) 3322 of 2025 :-

¶25

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act,to condone the delay of 859 days in filing the above review as against the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by this court in WP(MD).No.7486 of 2020.

¶26

Prayer in WA(MD)SR.No.57720 of 2024.

¶27

This Writ Appeal (MD)SR is filed under clause 15 of letter patent Act, to set aside order dated 17.3.2021 made in WP(MD).No.7486 of 2020 on the file of this court.

¶28

Prayer in WP(MD)No.7486 of 2020 :-

¶29

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to implement the interest of 10 percent to the gratuity amount from the retirement date of the petitioners passed by the controlling officer of payment of Gratuity/The Assistant

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Commissioner of Labour, Madurai in the order dt. 23.08.2017 in Panikodai No. 64/2016 filed by the 1st petitioner, in the order dt. 23.08.2017 in Panikodai NO.85/2016 filed by the 2nd petitiner, in the order dt., 23.08.2017 in Panikodai No.114/2016 filed by the 3rd petitioner, in the order dt. 23.08.2017 in Panikodai No.46/2016 filed by the 4th petitioner, in the order dt. 23.08.2017 in Panikodai No.31/2016 filed by the 5th petitioner in the order dt.23.08.2017 in Panikodai No.31/2016 filed by the 5^th petitioner in the order dated 23.08.2017 in panikodai No.24/16 filed by the 6^th petitioner in the order dated 25.06.2018 in panikodai 314/2016 filed by the 7^th petitioner, in the order dated 25.06.2018 in panikodai No.62/2017 filed by the 8^th petitioner, in the order dated 25.06.2018 in panikodai No.135/2017 filed by the 9^th petitionr, in the order dated 25.06.2018 in panikodai No.138/2017 filed by the 10^th petitioner to disburse the interest of 10% gratuity amount to the petitioners and fix a time frame.

¶32

ORDER:- This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming upon for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr..R.Ramasamy, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.P.Subbaraj,Special Government Pleader, for the respondents, this Court made the following order:

¶33

“ This Petition is Allowed ”

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶36

// True Copy //

¶37

/ /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS - I/II/III/IV)

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis