Jai Jebamani Vs D.Rajamani

CMP No. 9378 of 2025 1. Jai Jebamani W/o. Thiyagarajan, D/o. Late Dhanapal, No. 140, Hospital Street, Sendamangalam Town and Taluk, Namakkal District. Vs 1. D.Rajamani W/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 37, Meenakshi Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶25

Appellant(s)

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶28

2.C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi

¶29

D/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 14/19, Mahadevapuram St., No.2, Sekar Complex, Velur Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶30

3.C.Elangovan S/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 6/313-A, Sengadu, Powerkadu Post, Edapuli Nadu, Kolli Hills Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶31

4.C.Manimehalai, D/o. Late Chinnathambai, No. 1, Meenakshi Nagar, TVS Colony, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶32

5.J.Samuel Ponnaiah S/o. Late Jermiah, No. 66, Ganesapuram 2nd Street, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶33

6.The Sub Registrar Sendamangalam SRO, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District.

¶34

Respondent(s)

¶35

WA SR No. 19289 of 2025

1. Jai Jebamani

Appellant(s)

Vs

D.Rajamani

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶42

Respondent(s)

¶43

CMP No. 9381 of 2025

¶44

1. Jai Jebamani

¶45

W/o. Thiyagarajan, D/o. Late Dhanapal, No. 140, Hospital Street, Sendamangalam Town and Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶46

Appellant(s)

¶47

Vs

¶48

D.Rajamani W/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 37, Meenakshi Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶49

2.C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi D/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 14/19, Mahadevapuram St., No.2, Sekar Complex, Velur Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶50

3.C.Elangovan

¶51

S/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 6/313-A, Sengadu, Powerkadu Post, Edapuli Nadu, Kolli Hills Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶52

4.C.Manimehalai,

¶53

D/o. Late Chinnathambai, No. 1, Meenakshi Nagar, TVS Colony, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶54

5.J.Samuel Ponnaiah

¶55

S/o. Late Jermiah, No. 66,

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶58

Ganesapuram 2nd Street, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶59

6.The Sub Registrar Sendamangalam SRO, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District. Respondent(s) WA SR No. 19290 of 2025

¶60

Jai Jebamani Appellant(s) Vs 1. D.Rajamani Respondent(s) WA SR No. 19291 of 2025 1. Jai Jebamani Appellant(s) Vs 1. D.Rajamani

¶61

Respondent(s) CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶62

PRAYER

¶63

To grant leave to the petitioner to file present appeal before this Honble Court against the order passed in WP No. 22169 of 2024 dated 02.08.2024 and thus render justice.

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶66

CMP No. 9378 of 2025

¶67

PRAYER

¶68

To grant leave to the petitioner to file present appeal before this Honble Court against the order passed in WP No. 22162 of 2024 dated 02.08.2024 and thus render justice.

¶69

WA SR No. 19289 of 2025

¶70

PRAYER

¶71

CMP No. 9381 of 2025

¶72

PRAYER

¶73

To grant leave to the petitioner to file present appeal before this Honble Court against the order passed in WP No. 22167 of 2024 dated 02.08.2024 and thus render justice.

¶74

CMP No. 9374 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Mr. K.Balaji, For The Appellant For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Shrish For Mr.N.Manokaran For Rr1 To 5, Mr. P. Harish, Government Advocate For R6

¶75

ORDER

¶76

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.)

¶77

The present Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by a third party

¶78

seeking leave to challenge order dated 02.08.2024 passed in W.P.Nos.22162,

¶79

22167 and 22169 of 2024. Those Writ Petitions have been filed by 5 Writ Petitioners, viz., D.Rajamani, C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi, C.Elangovan,

¶80

C.Manimehalai, J.Samuel Ponnaiah. A sole respondent has been arrayed, being

¶81

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶82

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶83

The Sub Registrar, Sendamangalam SRO, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District.

¶84

The prayer in all the Writ Petitions relates to a challenge to refusal

¶85

check slips in RFK/Sendamangalam/58/2024, RFL/Sendamangalam/60/2024 and RFL/Sendamangalam/59/2024, all dated 18.07.2024, issued by the respondent therein. A consequential prayer was also sought, to register the sale deeds dated 18.07.2024 relating to a property admeasuring 92 cents (40075sq.ft.,), 13½ cents and 1.20 acres comprised in S.F.No.17/1, Bommasamuthiram Village, Sendamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶86

The Writ Petitions had been disposed on 02.08.2024 even prior to the

¶87

filing of counter by the respondent and the learned Judge records at paragraph 3

¶88

of that order that the Writ Petitions were taken up for final disposal by consent

¶89

of the parties. The learned Judge has allowed the Writ Petitions referring to a decree obtained in O.S.No.565 of 2000 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Namakkal dated 22.12.2000. That suit had been filed by P.Chinnathambi (first plaintiff), who was the husband and father of Writ Petitioners 1 to 4 and J.Samuvel Ponniah (5th Writ Petitioner), who was the second plaintiff.

¶90

The prayer in that suit was for specific performance directing the

¶91

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶92

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶93

Salem District Tamil (Strict) Baptist Trust Society, represented by three of the

¶94

members to execute a registered deed of conveyance free of all encumbrances in favour of those plaintiffs. The learned Judge notes that the suit had culminated

¶95

into a decree and E.P.No.140 of 2001 had been ordered on 11.03.2002 for

¶96

execution of the sale deed.

¶97

Premised on the fact that the proceedings had attained finality at that

¶98

stage, the learned Judge notes that in those circumstances, the question of refusing to register the valid sale deed does not arise. Learned Judge refers in

¶99

that context to a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2174 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024, wherein reference has been made to judgments of the Supreme Court as well.

¶100

Thus, proceeding on the fundamental principle of law that the decree

¶101

would bind the parties to it and no third party right could be affected by registration of the said decree, the learned Judge quashed the impugned refusal check slips and directed the Sub-Registrar, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District

¶102

to register the sale deed presented for registration.

¶103

The petitioner before us draws attention to the fact that, in fact, the

¶104

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶105

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶106

judgment and decree dated 22.12.2000 has not attained finality, in that, O.S.No.

¶107

127 of 2021 has been filed by the present petitioner before the District Munsif

¶108

Court, Sendamangalam, wherein the Salem District Tamil (Strict) Baptist Trust

¶109

Society/D1 and its members, D2 to D11 were arrayed as defendants. In fact,

¶110

Chinnathambi/husband and father of Writ Petitioners 1 to 4, and the 5th Writ

¶111

Petitioner, Samuel Ponniah are arrayed as D3 and D4 in that suit.

¶112

The relief sought in O.S.No.127 of 2021 reads as follows:

¶113

' 10) Mifahy; khz;g[kpF ePjpkd;wk; mth;fs; jat[bra;J.”

¶114

(a) jhth brhj;J bghWj;J ehkf;fy; khtl;l chpikapay; ePjpkd;wj;jpy; O.S.No.565/2000- k; tHf;fpd; nghpy; 22/12/2000?k; njjpapy; tH';fg;gl;l jPh;g;g[ kw;Wk; jPh;g;ghiz bry;yhJ (Nullity) vd tpsk;g[if bra;Jk;.

¶115

(b) mnj nghy; jhth brhj;J bghWj;J ehkf;fy; khtl;l chpikapay; ePjpkd;wj;jpy; REP.No.140/2001 ?d; nghpy; 11/03/2002?y; tH';fg;gl;l cj;jut[ bry;yhJ (Nullity) vd tpsk;g[if bra;Jk;.

¶116

(c) jhth brhj;J bghWj;J 4 Kjy; 7 gpujpthjpfSf;fhf ePjpkd;wnk 3k; gpujpthjp bgahpy; 10/04/2002 njjpapy; fpiua Mtzk; Vw;gLj;jp mij nre;jk';fyk; rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyfj;jpy; 1846/2002 vz;zhf gjpt[ bra;ag;gl;Ls;s fpiua Mtzk; bry;yhJ (Nullity) vd tpsk;g[if bra;Jk;.

¶117

(d) mnj nghy; nkw;go fpiu Mtzj;jpd; mog;gilapy; 3k; gpujpthjp 2k; gpujpthjp bgaUf;F 05/07/2013 njjpapy; fpiua Mtzk; Vw;gLj;jp mij nre;jk';fyk; rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyfj;jpy; nkw;go njjpapy; 2263/2013 vz;zhf gjpt[ bra;ag;gl;Ls;s

¶118

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶119

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶120

(e)

¶121

fpiua Mtzk; bry;yhJ (Nullity) vd tpsk;g[if bra;Jk;.

¶122

(e) nre;jk';fyk; rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyfj;jpy; 10/04/2002 njjpapy; gjpt[bra;ag;gl;l fpiua Mtz vz;? 1846/2002 kw;Wk; nkw;go rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyfj;jpy; 05.07.2013 njjpapy; gjpt[ bra;ag;gl;l fpiua Mtz vz;/ 2263/2013 Mfpa gjpt[ Mtz';fspd; mog;gilapy; 2. 3 gpujpthjpfs; vt;tpj ghuhjpdnkh. tpy;y';fnkh. Mtznkh Vw;gLj;jf;TlhJ vd nkw;goahh;fSf;F vjpuhf epue;ju jil cj;jut[ tH';fpa[k;.

¶123

(f) tHf;F bryt[ bjhif thjpf;F gpujpthjpfshy; fpilf;f tHp tif bra;Jk;.

¶124

(g) ,d;Dk; khz;g[kpF ePjpkd;wk; mth;fSf;F a[f;j;jkha; njhd;Wk; ,ju ghpfhu';fis thjpf;F tH';fpa[k; jPh;g;g[k;. jPh;ghiza[k; gpwg;gpf;f ntz;Lkha; thjp tzf;fkha; gpuhh;j;jpf;fpd;whh;/ '

¶125

In that suit, summons has, admittedly, been served upon the Writ

¶126

Petitioners, despite which, admittedly, there is no disclosure of the Original Suit

¶127

(O.S.No.127 of 2021) in the Writ affidavit. We are thus of the considered view

¶128

that there has been rank suppression of material facts by the Writ Petitioners in obtaining order dated 02.08.2024, for which purpose, they are put to terms and

¶129

shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of one week from date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶130

We are given to understand that Mr.C.Elangovan (3rd Writ Petitioner)

¶131

suffers from a memory disorder. Though this position is put to us across the bar,

¶132

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶133

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶134

and no medical records have been produced, we accept the submission and

¶135

exempt Mr.C.Elangovan from the terms as imposed above.

¶136

For the aforesaid reasons, these Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

¶137

Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeals, if they are otherwise in order,

¶138

and list the same for admission.

¶139

(ANITA SUMANTH J.)(N.SENTHILKUMAR J.) sl 05-08-2025

¶140

Index:Yes/No

¶141

Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

¶142

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶143

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶144

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶145

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶146

To

¶147

1.D.Rajamani

¶148

W/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 37, Meenakshi Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶149

2.C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi D/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 14/19, Mahadevapuram St., No.2, Sekar Complex, Velur Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶150

3.C.Elangovan

¶151

S/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 6/313-A, Sengadu, Powerkadu Post, Edapuli Nadu, Kolli Hills Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶152

4.C.Manimehalai,

¶153

D/o. Late Chinnathambai, No. 1, Meenakshi Nagar, TVS Colony, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶154

5.J.Samuel Ponnaiah

¶155

S/o. Late Jermiah, No. 66, Ganesapuram 2nd Street, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶156

6.The Sub Registrar Sendamangalam SRO, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District.

¶157

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶158

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶159

CMP No. 9378 of 2025

¶160

To

¶161

1.D.Rajamani W/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 37, Meenakshi Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶162

2.C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi D/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 14/19, Mahadevapuram St., No.2, Sekar Complex, Velur Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶163

3.C.Elangovan

¶164

S/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 6/313-A, Sengadu, Powerkadu Post, Edapuli Nadu, Kolli Hills Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶165

4.C.Manimehalai,

¶166

D/o. Late Chinnathambai, No. 1, Meenakshi Nagar, TVS Colony, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶167

5.J.Samuel Ponnaiah

¶168

S/o. Late Jermiah, No. 66, Ganesapuram 2nd Street, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶169

6.The Sub Registrar Sendamangalam SRO, Sendamangalam, Namakkal District.

¶170

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶171

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶172

WA SR No. 19289 of 2025

¶173

To

¶174

1.D.Rajamani

¶175

CMP No. 9381 of 2025

¶176

To

¶177

1.D.Rajamani W/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 37, Meenakshi Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶178

2.C.Hemasundari Bakyavathi D/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 14/19, Mahadevapuram St., No.2, Sekar Complex, Velur Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

¶179

3.C.Elangovan

¶180

S/o. Late Chinnathambi, No. 6/313-A, Sengadu, Powerkadu Post, Edapuli Nadu, Kolli Hills Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶181

4.C.Manimehalai, D/o. Late Chinnathambai, No. 1, Meenakshi Nagar, TVS Colony, Hasthampatti, Salem District.

¶182

5.J.Samuel Ponnaiah

¶183

S/o. Late Jermiah, No. 66, Ganesapuram 2nd Street, Namakkal,

¶184

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶185

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶186

Namakkal District.

¶187

6.The Sub Registrar Sendamangalam SRO,

¶188

Sendamangalam, Namakkal District.

¶189

WA SR No. 19290 of 2025

¶190

To

¶191

1.D.Rajamani

¶192

WA SR No. 19291 of 2025

¶193

To

¶194

1.D.Rajamani

¶195

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶196

CMP No. 9374 of 2025

¶197

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR J.

¶198

sl

¶199

CMP No. 9374 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 9378 OF 2025,WA SR NO. 19289 OF 2025,CMP NO. 9381 OF 2025,WA SR NO. 19290 OF 2025,WA SR NO. 19291 OF 2025

¶200

05-08-2025

¶201

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Jai Jebamani v. D.Rajamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Jebamani v. D.Rajamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.S.Kalaichelvan Vs S.Malliga

M/S. Aradhana Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Renault India Pvt. Ltd.

Manoharlal Hinduja(Deceased) Vs Jayesh B Dolia

Meenachi Vs The District Collector

R.Arumugaswamy Vs Ashok Velmar Seshadri

K Nandhakumar, IAS Vs Rajamma