Ramani Ammal v. Munisamy Naicker
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC single-judge order (T.V. Thamilselvi, J., 02-01-2025) ALLOWING C.M.P. 6163 of 2023 in Second Appeal S.A. 162 of 2006: proposed party impleaded as 8th respondent on allegations of continued interference with the appellants' possession despite a written no-interference agreement dated 13.10.2020 executed before Baluchettychatram Police Station, Kancheepuram District, following a police complaint; Registry to amend cause title; notice through court/private notice permitted, returnable 13.02.2025. Keywords: impleadment; necessary party; second appeal; Tamil Nadu; possession interference; undertaking. No statutes or cited precedents; no monetary amount; useful mainly for tracking party composition of S.A. 162/2006.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed: proposed party impleaded as 8th respondent in S.A. No. 162 of 2006; Registry directed to amend the cause title; notice to the 8th respondent through court (private notice permitted) returnable by 13.02.2025; matter posted on 13.02.2025.