V.S.Narayanan v. v.S.Vaithiyanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim stay refused; balance of convenience in favour of respondent/defendant; CMP No. 5230 of 2025 dismissed; partition suit by appellant dismissed by Trial Court; suit for delivery of possession by defendant decreed with mesne profits; OS No.1715 of 2019 and OS No.3228 of 2017, judgments dated 02.04.2024, VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai; appeals AS No. 206 of 2025 and AS No. 205 of 2025; Madras High Court; S.M. Subramaniam and K. Rajasekar JJ.; no statute or precedent cited; mesne profits quantum not stated.
What did the court decide?
The balance of convenience is in favour of the respondent/defendant; accordingly, the Court is not inclined to grant any interim order, and the Civil Miscellaneous Petition (CMP No. 5230 of 2025) seeking interim stay stands dismissed. ¶50-53