Allowed¶33

B. Santi v. the Director

Madras HC20 Mar 2025CMP/4653/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 660 days; CMP No. 4653 of 2025; OSA SR No. 61895 of 2024; Madras High Court; previous counsel failed to file appeal; minor girl child petitioner; Registry to number appeal and list for admission; B. Santi v. Director, Combat Vehicle Research and Development Estt., Avadi; M.Chandrabai; G. Krishnamurthy; Karthikeyan; A. Arulmozhi; C.Kumarappan J.; Anita Sumanth J.; 20-03-2025.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 660-day delay in filing OSA SR No. 61895 of 2024 granted; Registry to number the appeal and list it for admission if otherwise in order. ¶33

B. Santi Vs the Director — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP NO. 4653 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-03-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

CMP NO. 4653 of 2025 AND

¶7

OSA SR NO. 61895 OF 2024

¶8

B. Santi

¶9

W/o. M.Edwin Thankaraj, residing at No.43, 1st Street, B.V.Puram, Avadi, Chennai-600 054. and another

Appellant(s)

The Director

Combat Vehicle Research and Development Estt. Govt.of India, Ministry of Defense, Research and Development Organization, Avadi, Chennai-600 054 and another

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

OSA SR NO. 61895 of 2024

B. Santi

Appellant(s) Vs

The Director

Combat Vehicle Research and Development Estt. Govt.of India, Ministry of Defense, Research and Development Organization, Avadi, Chennai-600 054 and another

¶20

Respondent(s)

¶21

CMP NO. 4653 of 2025

¶22

For Appellant(s): Mr. G. Krishnamurthy

¶23

For Respondent(s): M/s Karthikeyan, For R1. M/s A. Arulmozhi,for R2.

¶24

OSA SR NO. 61895 of 2024 ORDER

¶25

(Order of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.)

¶26

The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 660 days in filing the

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA.

¶28

The reasons assigned for the condonation is that the previous counsel who promised to prefer the appeal has failed to file, and that on the receipt of the letter from department came

¶29

to know about the non-filing of the appeal, and engaged the present counsel and filed this appeal, but with the delay. It is also contended that, the second petitioner being a minor girl child, her interest also needs to be protected. Hence learned counsel prays to allow the petition.

¶30

Per contra, learned counsel for second respondent would strongly object the grounds raised in the petition is not reflecting correct factual position. Hence prays to dismiss the petition.

¶31

We have given our anxious consideration to the submissions of either side. What the petitioner wants is an adjudication on merits. The reasons assigned by the petitioner is that his previous counsel has not filed the appeal within time and, therefore, for the fault on the

¶32

part of his counsel, the petitioner should not be penalized. Apart from that, the second petitioner, being a minor girl child, her interest has also to be protected.

¶33

In view of the above reasons, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay and C.M.P.No. 4653 of 2025 is allowed. Registry to number the appeal and list the same for admission, if it is otherwise in order.

¶34

(ANITA SUMANTH J.) (C.KUMARAPPAN J.) 20-03-2025

¶35

ssm

¶36

CMP NO. 4653 of 2025

¶37

¶38

1. The Director

¶39

Combat Vehicle Research and Development Estt. Govt.of India, Ministry of Defense, Research and Development Organization, Avadi, Chennai-600 054

¶40