K.Kuppusamy v. D.Malar
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory order condoning 223 days' delay in representing appeal papers and directing the Registry to update counsel entries on record for the first respondent.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 223 days in representing case papers condoned; CMP allowed; Registry directed to update counsel names and number the appeal.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.30712 of 2025
in
A.S.No.53849 of 2025
P.B.BALAJI, J.
Registry is directed to remove the names of Mr.M.Guruprasad,
Mr.C.Ramaraj, Mr.N.S.Balaji and Mr.S.Uma Shankar, since
Mr.P.Muthukumaarasamy, Mr.P.K.Harinath Babu and Mr.D.Jagajothi, learned
counsels already entered appearance by way of change of Vakkalat for 1st
respondent.
- In respect of the application filed for condonation of delay of 223
days in representing the case papers in appeal, I have gone through the affidavit filed and I am satisfied with the reasons assigned. I do not find any willful inaction or lack of diligence on the side of the petitioner. The delay is
Coram
P.B.Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court