Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The Managing Director Vs Mohan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2025
The Managing Director Vs MohanThe Managing Director v. Mohan

Allowed¶34-36

The Managing Director v. Mohan

Madras HC2 Dec 2025CMP/29569/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 130 days; CMP No. 29569 of 2025; CMA.SR.No.162996 of 2025; Karnataka State Transport Corporation; Managing Director; Mohan; Madras High Court; court fees approval by Legal Section; delay in sanction; caveat filed by respondent; Registry to number appeal; dated 02-12-2025.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 130 days in filing the appeal condoned; C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 ordered; Registry directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order. ¶34-36

Why is it important?

Taking all factors into consideration, the delay of 130 days in filing the appeal stands condoned and C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 is ordered. ¶34-36

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Delay of 130 days in filing the appeal condoned; C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 ordered; Registry directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order.

Issue for consideration

Whether the delay of 130 days in filing the appeal ought to be condoned.

Court's answer

Taking all factors into consideration, the delay of 130 days in filing the appeal stands condoned and C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 is ordered.

Ratio / Principle

The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (order by C.V. Karthikeyan J. for the bench of C.V. Karthikeyan and K. Kumaresh Babu JJ.) allowed CMP No. 29569 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.162996 of 2025, condoning a delay of 130 days in filing an appeal by the Karnataka State Transport Corporation. The affidavit attributed the delay to court fees requiring approval by the Legal Section and delay in sanctioning payment. The respondent in the proposed appeal (Mr. Mohan) had filed a caveat and his counsel was heard. The Registry was directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order.

A

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-12-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

in

CMA.SR.No.162996 of 2025

The Managing Director, Karnataka State Transport Corporation

Appellant(s)

Vs

Mr.Mohan

S/o. Gurumoorthy, No.4-40, Edagupalli, Nanganoor Post, Chittoor and now res. at No.43, Ramachary Street, Vellore.

Respondent(s)

For Appellant(s): Mr. T. Thiyagarajan

For Respondent(s): Mr.C. Prabakaran

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)

1/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed, seeking to condone the

delay of 130 days in filing the appeal by the respondent/Karnataka State

Transport Corporation.

2/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

The respondent in the appeal had filed Caveat. The learned counsel is

also present and heard the learned counsel.

In the affidavit filed, giving the reasons for the delay, it had been stated

that the Court fees had to be approved by the Legal Section and it had to be paid

towards filing of the appeal. There has been delay in sanctioning the said aspect.

4.Taking all factors into consideration, the delay of 130 days stands

condoned and C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 is

ordered.

Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.

kak

Index:Yes/No

3/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

4/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

To

1.Mohan S/o. Gurumoorthy, No.4-40, Edagupalli, Nanganoor Post, Chittoor and now res. at No.43, Ramachary Street, Vellore.

5/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

kak

CMP No. 29569 of 2025 in

C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025

6/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP No. 29569 of 2025

02-12-2025

7/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the delay of 130 days in filing the appeal ought to be condoned.¶23-25
The court held
Taking all factors into consideration, the delay of 130 days in filing the appeal stands condoned and C.M.P.No.29569 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.162996 of 2025 is ordered.ratio¶34-36

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
The respondent in the proposed appeal had filed a caveat.¶29
Prior proceeding
Affidavit explaining the delay states that court fees had to be approved by the Legal Section and paid towards filing of the appeal, and there was delay in sanctioning it.¶31-32

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
The Managing Director, Karnataka State Transport Corporation¶10
T. Thiyagarajan
respondent
Mr. Mohan¶13
C. Prabakaran

Coram

AI extract

C.V. Karthikeyanauthor¶19
K. Kumaresh Babumember¶6

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 2 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 21 Nov 2025
Case no.: CMP/29569/2025
CNR: HCMA012806102025
Bench: C.v. Karthikeyan K.kumaresh Babu
Disposal: DELAY CONDONED
Case type: CMP

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from C.v. Karthikeyan K.kumaresh Babu

The Managing Director Vs Parimalam
1 Dec 2025
Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs M. Dhanam
2 Dec 2025
Chinnaiyan Vs Kalaiselvi
2 Dec 2025
Meenatchisundaram Vs Valliammal
2 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

The Managing Director v. Mohan, CMP/29569/2025 (MAD), decided on 2 December 2025.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history2

The respondent in the proposed appeal had filed a caveat.
Affidavit explaining the delay states that court fees had to be approved by the Legal Section and paid towards filing of the appeal, and there was delay in sanctioning it.

View full history

Bench / Coram

C.V. Karthikeyan and K. Kumaresh Babu

Parties & counsel