Application to condone a 123-day delay in representing an income-tax appeal before the Madras High Court. The court heard counsel and allowed the application for reasons stated in the affidavit.
Delay of 123 days in representing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
CMP NO. 27024 of 2025
in TCA SR No.168298 of 2025
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 2, Chennai.
Appellant(s)
Vs
Cholan Auto Finance 43, Padma Tower, 3rd Floor Covai Road, Karur 639 002.
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
M/s.S.Brindaa For Mr.R.Karthik
____________ Page 1 of 2_
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and G.Arul Murugan, J.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
This application is filed to condone the delay of 123 days in representation of the appeal.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 13.11.2025
sra
CMP No.27024 of 2025 in TCA SR No.168298 of 2025
____________ Page 2 of 2_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 123-day delay in representing the appeal should be condoned?
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 2, Chennai
Cholan Auto Finance, Karur
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
