Allowed¶23

Pathfinder Enterprise Solution v. Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj

Madras HC13 Nov 2025CMP/21024/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 13-11-2025; CMP No. 21024 of 2025 in AS SR No. 64564 of 2025; condonation of 260 days' delay in filing appeal suit; appellant Pathfinder Enterprise Solution Pvt Ltd vs respondents Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj, Abdul Khaliq Siddique, Saidha P.M; petition allowed on basis of supporting affidavit; Registry to number appeal if otherwise in order; Bench: Dr. G. Jayachandran J. (author) and Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 260 days in filing the appeal suit condoned; Registry directed to number the appeal suit (AS SR No. 64564 of 2025) if otherwise in order. ¶23

Pathfinder Enterprise Solution Vs Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP NO. 21024 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13-11-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

CMP NO. 21024 of 2025 IN

¶7

AS SR NO. 64564 OF 2025

¶8

Pathfinder Enterprise Solution pvt Ltd., rep by its Directors (amended as per order in IA No.3/2021) dated 23.10.2021) No.42, Perambur Barracks Road, Vepery, Chennai 7. and 2 Others

¶9

Appellant(s)

¶10

¶11

Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj W/o. T.K. Thilagaraj, No.C1202, Aisshwarya Excellency Apartments, Old Madras Road, Vijinapura (Opp to TIN Factory) Bangalore North, Dooryaninagar, Bangalore 560 016. and 2 Others

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

For Appellant(s): L.Murali Krishnan K. Vijayakumar S. Jecintha S. Janani Jaya Hari Rasika For Respondent(s):

¶14

V. Chandrakanthan

¶15

S. Praveen-ms/196/2021

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

A.K.Nandhini A.Nithish Vikaram For R1 Batta With Petition And Affidavit Due Reg Rr2 And 3 Pvt Notice

¶19

---------------R-3 SAIDHA P.M AVP Goverenance R-2 No Such Person

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Dr.G.Jayachandran J.)

¶22

In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition, the delay of 260 days in filing the appeal, is condoned.

¶23

Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous petition is ordered. Registry is

¶24

directed to number the appeal suit, if it is otherwise in order .

¶25

(Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN J.) (MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J.)

13-11-2025

skr (2/2)

Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj W/o. T.K. Thilagaraj, No.C1202, Aisshwarya Excellency Apartments, Old Madras Road, Vijinapura (Opp to TIN

¶30

Page 2 of 3

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Factory) Bangalore North, Dooryaninagar, Bangalore 560 016. 2. Abdul Khaliq Siddique S/o. Mohamood Siddique, No.3, Nawab Habibullah Avenue, 3rd St, Nungambakkm, Grems Road, Chennai 6. 3. Saidha P.M AVP Goverenance, M/s. Pathfinder Enterprise Solutions Pt Ltd., No.42, Perambur Barracks Road, Vepery, Chennai 7.

¶33

Page 3 of 3

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Pathfinder Enterprise Solution v. Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pathfinder Enterprise Solution v. Vijayalakshmi Thilagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Manigandan

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs S Prem Singh

Kamatchi Vs Saravanan

K.Vinoth Vs v.Shankar

Fousia, Vs Gulab John

Vijayalakshmi, Vs S.Vanithammal (Died) 1. C.Santhalingam