S.Nirmala v. P.Ponni
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court condoned a delay of 46 days in filing an appeal under C.M.P. No. 20589 of 2022, finding the respondents put up only token resistance. The matter was listed for further hearing.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 46 days condoned; appeal directed to be numbered.
What the court decided
CMP NO. 20589 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
CMP NO. 20589 of 2022 AND
OSA SR NO. 37921 OF 2022,CMP NO. 24387 OF 2023
S.Nirmala W/o.Late. C.Sathyanarayanan, 19-A, Rangabashyam Street, Saidapet, Chennai-15 and 3 Others Vs P.Ponni D/o. Late. P. Chakrapani Reddiar, No.8/2, Elaiyalwar Koil St, Saidapet, Chennai 15. and 6 Others OSA SR NO. 37921 of 2022 S.Nirmala W/o.Late. C.Sathyanarayanan, 19-A, Rangabashyam Street, Saidapet, Chennai-15 and 3 Others
Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)
Appellant(s)
Vs
P.Ponni W/o.Pannagasayanan, New No.8/1, Elaiyalwar Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-15 and 6 Others
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 46 days in preferring the appeal is condonable?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Nirmala W/o.Late. C.Sathyanarayanan and 3 Others
- respondent
P.Ponni D/o. Late. P. Chakrapani Reddiar and 6 Others
- respondent
P.Ponni W/o.Pannagasayanan and 11 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court